Its really better in future.motorola always keep in mind the customer requirement

To late Motorola Xiaomi made there mi 12s ultra

Untiop, 15 Jul 2022I'm so confused about pixel binning for last few days. I was thinking pixel binning is ... more Strictly speaking it's a hardware-level function, but it might as well be software, software could do the same task only better (IQ-wise), but hardware binning is done at a hardware level for faster readout and a lower data load downstream, this could translate to a faster burst rate and/or a slower buffer fill, lower preview latency etc. so software binning has the downsides of a higher processing load, higher storage requirements etc. and none of the speed advantages of hardware binning. Quad bayer severely lowers the chromatic resolution of the full readout making a stronger argument for a binned readout, which would be hardware based, but then doing the full readout and remosiacing could technically still provide superior IQ, I honestly don't know which one is actually being done when the default output is 12.5MP, it's hard to see through all the different processing done to an OOCJPG from a smartphone these days. Also, the full readout sample here is waxy, as always, but IIRC there have been certain cases in which reviewers tried converting the full res DNG and got superior results than 50MP OOCJPG, so it's hard to tell the natural disadvantage of the color filter from bad processing. I've always thought that the full potential of a quad bayer sensor could be realized only through Gcam doing a stack of full readouts, with that subpixel sampling (forgot what it's called) enabled.

Lccy, 14 Jul 20221 inch 3:2 has a crop factor of 2.7, with 4:3 the crop factor will be smaller, let's call... more AFAIK the crop factor is based on the diagonal, so unless you're telling me type-1" 4:3 has a different diagonal than type-1" 3:2 I think it's the same. The FoV of a 1" module in a phone is also unlikely to have a FoV of less than 24mm equiv. so taking that into account not even f/2.8 at FF is "razor thin" except near MFD. A 24/1.4 might be called "razor thin" if shot reasonably close.

Better looking than I expected. Especially if it's already compressed. This 200mp sensor might bring okish looking photos. At least compared to whats out currently anyway...

So it looks like you get 50 real pixels. Very nice. I hope it has a good enough lens to output the detail of 50 MP.

Yuri84, 15 Jul 2022200mp sounds cool but the image looks horrendous when zoomed in. At least on the edges of pape... more Samsung has disabled band locking through June update and it sucks.

I don't care about camera. Please make it flat panel and 8+ gen 1 under 550USD for 256GB. You don't release 256GB in my country. Sad AF.

Apl hype no bite as usual with phone makers these days. Recycling

Here we go again with the bigger is better marketing hype that is full of sound and furyl, signifying nothing. Most people take pictures of moving subjects like pets and children, yet both the mobile marketing divisions and reviewers refuse to include this true real world test of a mobile camera's capabilities in their reviews. Capture a blur-free image of a rambunctious toddler in action and I'll take notice. Even a low end mobile can capture a decent snap of a stagnant flower on a brightly lit day.

It just give the depth in video.. That's all

Untiop, 15 Jul 2022I'm so confused about pixel binning for last few days. I was thinking pixel binning is ... more There is no upscaling when pixel binning. You either choose the lower 12MP pixel binning resolution (or whatever your phone default pixel binning MP resolution) in the camera settings before you take the picture. Or alternatively choose the highest resolution (100MP or more if you haven't very high MegaPixel phone) of the sensor without any pixel binning in the camera settings before you take a picture 📸 Usually the pixel binned image will look overall better. Though in very good light conditions high resolution images taken without any pixel binning can look good.

200mp sounds cool but the image looks horrendous when zoomed in. At least on the edges of paper. Tons of blur. Did they take 16 pictures at different times while the paper was moving? Or did they move the sensor while keeping the lens static? Or is this just aberration or other optical effect of crappy lens? I think I'll keep my A52s, it takes decent pictures.

S Yu, 14 Jul 2022It will definitely default to 12MP, no need for an "option", in fact there may not b... more I'm so confused about pixel binning for last few days. I was thinking pixel binning is actually a software thing(not sure. Maybe it partly is when binning different number of pixels than what the sensor bins). But recently I saw that binning is done at the RGB colour filter level over the sensor. So quad Bayer filter used over a 50 Megapixel camera outputs native 12.5 MP image right? And only after doing something called re-moasaic or something the image is upscaled back to 50 MP right? So all the higher megapixel sensors(Max of 108 till date) natively outputs 12-12.5 MP just with bigger pixel size. And when I checked in Samsung website for HP1, it says 4*4 = 16 to 1 pixel binning. So 200/16 = 12.5 MP should be the native output which is them upscaled to 50 or full 200 megapixel through software. Isn't this what's happening..? I'm confused. If someone could share exact info on this it'd be great! Thanks :)

you have to suffer, 15 Jul 2022however, some stupid "average" customers believe that more ram is faster rather than... more Oye Idiot may be you are right but still you are not 100% right... it depends on all of the components of the system

Duke, 14 Jul 2022 Let's see a 200mp snap! Any chance of a space zoom on this? taking a picture of mars would just display red circle. nothing else

Anonymous, 15 Jul 2022 Well said. Average consumers just don't care about the numbers however, some stupid "average" customers believe that more ram is faster rather than chipset. they somehow cared about numbers.

you have to suffer, 15 Jul 2022what he said is true. we live in the era where android phone companies always use megapixels f... more Well said. Average consumers just don't care about the numbers

The photo sample may look enticing, but no one can tell whether that photo sample was an edit or straight from the sensor without any editing whatsoever.

I just don't care about camera. Pixel takes better pictures than this. I wish it had flat panel instead of curved and it had 5500 capacity in battery.

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2022 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data